15 Apr, 2009

Big Cuts in Greenhouse Gas Emissions to Save Arctic Ice, Reduce Sea Level Rise

Posted by: Naturally In: Environment

Accoring to new research, the threat of global warming can still be greatly diminished if nations cut emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases by 70 percent this century.

While global temperatures would rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea level rise, could be partially avoided.

The study, led by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), will be published next week in Geophysical Research Letters. It was funded by the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation, NCAR’s sponsor.

“This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century,” says NCAR scientist Warren Washington, the lead author. “But if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize the threat of climate change and avoid catastrophe.”

Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree Celsius (almost 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) since the pre-industrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, predominantly carbon dioxide. This heat-trapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million (ppm) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today.

With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree C (1.8 degrees F) may be the threshold for dangerous climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. The U.S. Congress is also debating the issue.

To examine the impact of such cuts on the world’s climate, Washington and his colleagues ran a series of global supercomputer studies with the NCAR-based Community Climate System Model. They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. That figure comes from the U.S. Climate Change Science Program, which has cited 450 ppm as an attainable target if the world quickly adapts conservation practices and new green technologies to cut emissions dramatically. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm by 2100 if unchecked.

The team’s results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees C (about 1 degree F) above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by almost four times that amount, to 2.2 degrees C (4 degrees F) above current readings, if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course.

Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modeling study:

* Sea level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimeters (about 5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimeters (8.7 inches). Significant additional sea level rise would be expected in either scenario from melting ice sheets and glaciers.

* Arctic ice in the summertime would shrink by about a quarter in volume and stabilize by 2100, as opposed to shrinking at least three-quarters and continuing to melt. Some research has suggested the summertime ice will disappear altogether this century if emissions continue on their current trajectory.

* Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half, helping preserve fisheries and populations of sea birds and Arctic mammals in such regions as the northern Bering Sea.

* Significant regional changes in precipitation, including decreased precipitation in the U.S. Southwest and an increase in the U.S. Northeast and Canada, would be cut in half if emissions were kept to 450 ppm.

* The climate system would stabilize by about 2100, instead of continuing to warm.

The research team used supercomputer simulations to compare a business-as-usual scenario to one with dramatic cuts in carbon dioxide emissions beginning in about a decade. The authors stressed that they were not studying how such cuts could be achieved nor advocating a particular policy.

“Our goal is to provide policymakers with appropriate research so they can make informed decisions,” Washington says. “This study provides some hope that we can avoid the worst impacts of climate change–if society can cut emissions substantially over the next several decades and continue major cuts through the century.”

Source
U.S.Department of Energy

1 Response to "Big Cuts in Greenhouse Gas Emissions to Save Arctic Ice, Reduce Sea Level Rise"

1 | IONIESKYE

May 26th, 2009 at 5:18 am

Avatar

Deforestation: The hidden cause of global warming. In the next 24 hours, deforestation will release as much CO2 into the atmosphere as 8 million people flying from London to New York. Stopping the loggers is the fastest and cheapest solution to climate change. Carbon emissions from deforestation far outstrip damage caused by planes and automobiles and factories. Rampant slashing and burning of tropical forests is second only to the energy sector as a source of greenhouses gases… Deforestation accounts for up to 25 per cent of global emissions of heat-trapping gases, while transport and industry account for 14 per cent each; and aviation makes up only 3 per cent of the total. Deforestation is equivalent to the carbon footprint of eight million people flying to New York. Reducing those catastrophic emissions can be achieved most quickly and most cheaply by halting the destruction in Brazil, Indonesia, the Congo and elsewhere. Most people think of forests only in terms of the CO2 they absorb. The rainforests of the Amazon, the Congo basin and Indonesia are thought of as the lungs of the planet. But the destruction of those forests will in the next four years alone pump more CO2 into the atmosphere than every flight in the history of aviation to at least 2025. From 2003, two billion tons of CO2 enters the atmosphere every year from deforestation. That destruction amounts to 50 million acres – or an area the size of England, Wales and Scotland, the remaining standing forest is calculated to contain 1,000 billion tons of carbon, or double what is already in the atmosphere. If we lose forests, we lose the fight against climate change. Forests offer the “single largest opportunity for cost-effective and immediate reductions of carbon emissions”. International demand has driven intensive agriculture, logging and ranching that has proved an inexorable force for deforestation; conservation has been no match for commerce. Place deforestation on top of the agenda! Richer nations already recognise the value of uncultivated land… per hectare subsidies or “environmental services” to its farmers to leave their land unused. And yet there is no agreement on placing a value on the vastly more valuable land in developing countries. More than 50 per cent of the life on Earth is in tropical forests, which cover less than 7 per cent of the planet’s surface. They generate the bulk of rainfall worldwide and act as a thermostat for the Earth. Forests are also home to 1.6 billion of the world’s poorest people who rely on them for subsistence.
http://www.greenpeace.org

Comment Form

Find The Latest


  • Francis: The FDA is a government agency. The Government gets their money from taxes. Regular cigarettes and the cigarette industry pays lots of taxes. The ATF
  • James: No one leaves bad oil, transmission fluid, etc in a car and then tries to pour something else in to fix it, but that is what seems to be happening wi
  • Naturally: Yes, agreed. It may be the lesser evil. However, people should still be aware of this information and the fact that nicotine is indeed a drug.

Natural Medicine Blog

Natural Medicine Blog by Doctor L

Featured Directory Listing

RSS Featured Listing