17 Sep, 2009

Is Your Cell Phone a High or Low Radiation Emitter

Posted by: Naturally In: Community

Public health officials’ concerns about the possible dangers of radiofrequency emissions are intensifying as wireless devices proliferate amid a lack of research on the impact.  There have been several studies that indicate that high cell phone use can result in brain damage.   Recent scientific studies have produced evidence linking brain and salivary gland tumors to cell phone use.  There is especially concern for children as the cell phone use by children continues to grow rapidly.

Thus far, health agencies in six nations — Switzerland, Germany, Israel, France, the United Kingdom, and Finland — have issued warnings to limit cell phone use, particularly by children, whose softer, thinner skulls are less able to shield the brain from radiation. Scientists have found that children’s brains absorb twice as much cell phone radiation as those of adults.  Noticeably absent from this list is the United States.

According to the CTIA Wireless Association, an international industry group, U.S. wireless subscribers numbered 270.3 million — 87 percent of Americans — as of December 2008, a 30 percent jump in three years. Some 60 percent of the global population — 4 billion people — subscribe to wireless services, according to Cellular News, an online global industry news outlet.

“We would like to be able to say that cell phones are safe,” said Olga Naidenko, Ph.D., EWG Senior Scientist and lead author of the study. “But we can’t. The most recent science, while not conclusive, raises serious issues about the cancer risk of cell phone use that must be addressed through further research. In the meantime, consumers can take steps to reduce exposure.”

Better Consumer Information Vital

In response to this growing health issue, the Environmental Working Group’s (EWG) research team has assembled the most comprehensive online consumer guide ever to cell phone radiation, rating more than 1,000 cell phones marketed in the U.S.

With this free, user-friendly online tool, consumers can make informed decisions about which cell phones to buy. The EWG guide uses easy-to-read graphics to illustrate each phone’s radiofrequency emissions, enabling consumers to make quick comparisons of radiation output of various wireless devices. 

“The first cell phones were marketed to adults,” Naidenko said. “But today, children are just as likely to own a cell phone as a video game, baseball or bicycle.”

According to the Pew Internet and American Life Project, which tracks cell phone use among U.S. children between 12 and 17 years old, last year (2008) 71 percent of tweens and teens owned cell phones. More than half use the device daily.

Outdated Radiation Standards

EWG’s analysis of possible public health risks of cell phone radiation culminates a 10-month investigation of more than 200 peer-reviewed studies, government advisories and industry documents.

The EWG concluds that the current U.S. cell phone radiation standards, set by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and based largely on 1992 cell phone industry recommendations, are outdated and allow 20 times more radiation to penetrate the head than the rest of the body.

EWG is urgeing the FCC to upgrade its standards to take account of the newest scientific evidence and also increasing cell phone use by children.   In addition, the EWG urges concerned consumers to take action and tell the federal government that cell phone makers should be required to disclose each phone’s radiation output on the label.

Know Your Cell Phone Radiation Emissions

To help consumers, the EWG has created a new searchable interactive database of radiation emmisions from cell phones.  The data is based on technical specifications of cell phones currently on the market and some popular older models.  Cell phones can be searched by model.  A separate database details radiation levels of smart phones.

EWG Top 10 low emission phones:

1. Samsung Impression (SGH-a877) [AT&T]

2. Motorola RAZR V8 [CellularONE]

3. Samsung SGH-t229 [T-Mobile]

4. Samsung Rugby (SGH-a837) [AT&T]

5. Samsung Propel Pro (SGH-i627) [AT&T]

6. Samsung Gravity (SGH-t459) [CellularONE, T-Mobile]

7. T-Mobile Sidekick [T-Mobile]

8. LG Xenon (GR500) [AT&T]

9. Motorola Karma QA1 [AT&T]

10. Sanyo Katana II [Kajeet]

EWG’s Top 10 high radiation emmision phones:

1. Motorola MOTO VU204 [Verizon Wireless]

2. T-Mobile myTouch 3G [T-Mobile]

3. Kyocera Jax S1300 [Virgin Mobile]

4. Blackberry Curve 8330 [Sprint, U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless, MetroPCS]

5. Motorola W385 [U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless]

6. T-Mobile Shadow [T-Mobile]

7. Motorola C290 [Sprint, Kajeet]

8. Motorola i335 [Sprint]

9. Motorola MOTO VE240 [Cricket, MetroPCS]

10. Blackberry Bold 9000 [AT&T]

Safer Cell Phone Use Tips

Cell phones are now an essential feature of modern life for most people.  We ared not going to all give up cell phones.  Like other aspects of modern ife that involve health risks, limiting risk is the practical option.  Here are four things you can do from the EWG report.

1:  Chose a phone with low radiation emmissions.

2:  Text more, talk less.

3:  Use headsets and the speakerphone option if available.

4:  Stay off the phone when few bars indicate a weak signal.

You can find the EWG database and report here.  : http://www.ewg.org/cellphone-radiation

Source
EWG

Tags:

2 Responses to "Is Your Cell Phone a High or Low Radiation Emitter"

1 | nahla

October 8th, 2009 at 1:27 am

Avatar

NOKIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! is not included in the higher or lower emmsion cell phone??????

2 | Naturally

October 8th, 2009 at 2:18 am

Avatar

Well it seems it is somewhere in the middle -

Comment Form

Find The Latest


  • Francis: The FDA is a government agency. The Government gets their money from taxes. Regular cigarettes and the cigarette industry pays lots of taxes. The ATF
  • James: No one leaves bad oil, transmission fluid, etc in a car and then tries to pour something else in to fix it, but that is what seems to be happening wi
  • Naturally: Yes, agreed. It may be the lesser evil. However, people should still be aware of this information and the fact that nicotine is indeed a drug.

Natural Medicine Blog

Natural Medicine Blog by Doctor L

Featured Directory Listing

RSS Featured Listing